Tuesday, March 06, 2007

Procrastination Celebration 2007

Hello,
Midterms week! In honor of this, that bastion of procrastination, I would like to formally welcome you to Linkfest 2007. This post is really ridden with links, even more than usual for me. If you're going to be clicking on them, I recommend you open them outside of this window so that you don't have to navigate back and forth.

Onward!

The star of today's post is a long article from late January in the NY Times. It is an absolutely fascinating read, when you have time, and is about the limits of scientific reductionist thinking as applied to food and nutritional science.

Unhappy Meals

And here's his book. Buy it!


Also, I've been meaning to do a huge Youtube post, supplemented by Wikipedia when appropriate.So, here you go, this is a couple of hours of entertainment probably, if you are inspired by these links to do further youtubing/wikipedia crawling especially. I'll break it down by category. I really like sharing interesting things I come across, as you may have noticed. If you appreciate posts like this, it would be great to hear from you. Also, send me cool stuff you find and I'll post it here.

Also, in news, there's a new Ry Cooder CD. Supposed to be good.

Have a great Spring Break everyone! Thanks for stopping by. Serious Youtube post-effort below.

Best,
George


----------------------------------


Youtube/Wikipedia Extravaganza:
(Seriously, open links in other windows. You've been warned.)

Miscellaneous:

Cool Intro to Web 2.0

Don't copy that floppy!
(Wow, what are going to be the self-ridiculing artifacts of our era? I can't believe it's not butter, clearly.)

Parkour:
Trust me, if you don't know what parkour is, this is a really cool thing to spend about 30 minutes learning about. Here's the trajectory you follow:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parkour


then read this:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_running


then, watch some.

Youtube: Russian Parkour (Dvinsk Clan, if you wanted to know who this is)

So, impressed yet? Check this out: Parkour is part of a larger culture of urban athletics, urban martial arts, capoiera, etc. Tricking is another cool aspect of this scene. That's the next place we'll go.

Tricking:

First, read this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tricking

Now that you understand a little about it, you should get an idea for the basic techniques. These videos are all very short:

Tricking Tutorials:

Standing Tuck

Wallflip
Sideflip
540 Kick
Standing Back Tuck
Webster
Cheat Gainer

Now, you're ready to sufficiently appreciate the best tricking in the world. It's face-melting time:

World's Best Tricking, Volume III (The best one, watch this one first!)
Volume I
Volume II

K, that was a lot of work, please check it out.


Next:

Music Videos:

Royskopp, "Remind Me" (Had this in mind with the title and subject matter of my previous post.)

Regina Spektor, "Us," "Fidelity"

Dizzee Rascal:
First, read this b/c it's fascinating, so many directions you can go from here. I love how talented his brother is as well. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dizzee_Rascal

Freestyle

Fix Up, Look Sharp

Jus a Rascal

Dream

John Lee Hooker, "Tupelo Blues"
This guys voice leaves me absolutely dumbstruck, every time.

Derek Trucks, Random Solo, "After Midnight" with Clapton

The Faces: Stay with Me (Live)



Wow, that was positively a glut of stuff. I hope you find at least one thing that does it for you.

And if you didn't, just to be ridiculous, here's the entirety of Seinfeld's standup in New York, broken into 6 files:
Part 1
Part 2
Part 3
Part 4
Part 5
Part 6
Take care,
G

Sunday, February 25, 2007

Need Reminding

It's non-trivial, I think, to try to conceptualize in real-time the sheer complexity of the things going on in the biosphere, and the things going on in the world economy, and how they interact. The amount of things going on, the degree to which those things affect other things, it's absurdly complicated, and if you could perceive those interactions in real time, you would probably lose your mind.

Just thinking about the economy of a single nation-- the number of people, the number of jobs, the degree to which your daily existence depends on thousands of others, it's something that we can only realize in fits and starts.

Try to perceive, and then appreciate, the complexity of the world around you.

Friday, February 23, 2007

"We cannot cave in to the current trend"

I realized tonight, I have had a long-standing interest in trickery and fraud-- really, the the art of the confidence man in general. The sheer balls required, the observational skills, the quick-thinking, the risk tolerance, it's a fascinating mix of human characteristics and, for better or for worse, here's the thought that really interests me-- that seeing a truly talented fraud artist at work is a very good way to, if you suspend judgment, simply observe a whole collection of uniquely human talents, to gain insight on the human experience, and to reveal human character. There's just something so interesting about the professional liar to me. Not a compulsive liar, someone who does it for PROFIT.

Now, to unite that interest with another passion of mine, rationality and atheism, it should come as no surprise that the idea of the faith healer and, in general, frauds of the paranormal variety, are the most fascinating. People like Peter Popoff are to me both terrifying and fascinating. I can think of no other response to them. Watch this video:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M9w7jHYriFo

Obviously, no one will ever make Popoff's mistake again, and the jig is certainly much more elaborate today, but the truly noteworthy thing to keep in mind is that when you watch someone doing this, you're watching a self-confident, incredibly talented liar at work. And when they're good, their mastery of the art of deception and ability to keep it going on-the-go, in front of such a huge audience, it's nothing short of remarkable. The thing with Uri Geller is pretty fascinating too, and the thing at the end with the sleight-of-hand is eye opening as well, but for me what really sends chills down my spine is Peter Popoff's sheer mastery of his craft. He claims to hear God talking-- as you'll see, I don't want to ruin the surprise, but he is truly a master at creating the effect. The first video of him, pay attention, you have no insight into the secret, and look how compelling he is. He has not read this ahead of time, about these people-- when he starts the sermon, he knows nothing about any of them. This is true. Then, when you see what's going on, you'll see what an incredibly confident multitasker he had to be, and to be smooth, never reveal his craft. If he said one wrong thing, he looks like an idiot, in front of all those people. And night in, night out, he has enough confidence to walk out there and walk this tightrope again. For millions and millions a year-- just a cold-blooded thief!

The thing with Uri Geller, especially when he is on the Johnny Carson show-- to me, the exposure of fraudulent claims in general, in the name of reason and rationality, is a kind of modern-day heroics, and James Randi, consequently, to me has one of the most honorable professions on Earth. The encouragement of reason and the debunking of paranormal bullshit and such is just so very much inline with everything that the modern, morally conscious person should stand for.



It also bears repeating, and this part isn't funny, that in any reasonable incarnation of society, that had its priorities in order, if someone said this, shouted this at you:


"You've got cancer of the stomach? Are you ready for God to burn that cancer out? Here it goes in the Mighty...
Devil back off...
BACK OFF DEVIL!
Hallelujah!"

And if that person convinced you that they were being honest, and that the cancer was gone, and you went home and stopped taking your medicine, that that person would be in prison. Even if you didn't pay them, even if they didn't earn any money from that, they would be in prison for doing completely unnecessary harm to another human being.

What that person is doing is evil, and when the church prevents condom use in Africa because it is against their definition of sinful activity, when the church agitates against the introduction of the HPV vaccine because it thinks that the threat of HPV, and of subsequent cervical cancer, is an effective sexual deterrent, and therefore that the HPV vaccine would encourage promiscuity and thus sinful behavior-- they are showing that they are willing to let people (just women, in this case) die to preserve a non-rational, non-falsifiable paranormal doctrine, and that's evil. They'd rather let people die than let them "sin," or engage in behavior that is wrong according to their divine holy books, and that is not just crazy, it's evil and should not be tolerated. I have a book that's 2000 years old that came not from a rational process, nor from experience or experimentation, no it was DELIVERED FROM THE GODS, and it says that sex is bad, and I have political power, so I am going to do everything I can to prevent the introduction of a vaccine that would help to prevent cervical cancer, which (unnecessarily) kills 230,000 women a year

There's a name for that-- when the deaths of large numbers of a certain kind of people die are justified by vicious, irrational ideology-- it's called genocide.

Here's a great starting point: what is the rationale for blanket religious tolerance? Is it deserved? Would the world be a better place if we were a little less tolerant of irrational faith? Here's my question-- does the respect that we have for people's right to their zealotry extend to the point that we will prop up their right to prevent the alleviation of harm and suffering? If it does, we should be ashamed of ourselves. There's absolutely no justifiable reason why evangelism, the spread of what robust, rigorous scientific inquiry has demonstrated to be irrational bullshit, should be not only legal, but explicitly protected by law. And I agree with Dawkins-- "child abuse" is the proper term for indoctrinating children into a religion before they're old enough to think for themselves, and before they are exposed to a variety of cultures, peoples, and ideas. Why is this:

"Hi, I'm 10, I really like Dora the explorer, and I really love Jesus!"

any less ridiculous to say than this?

"Hi, I'm 10, I really like Dora the explorer, and I'm an existentialist!"

and even, strangely, this seems to make people uncomfortable:

"Hi, I'm 10, I really like Dora the explorer, and I'm a devil-worshipper!"

"The church says one must be faithful in marriage and save oneself for marriage," said Senegal Bishop Alexandre Mbengue. "We cannot cave in to the current trend."

(explaining why condoms shouldn't be part of the fight of AIDS in Africa. This is a Bishop. What he says affects lots of people.)

"Burning this ARTHRIIIIIIIIIIIITS! Right out of your BODYYYY!"

-George

Saturday, December 16, 2006

The 4-Cylinder Nissan Chronicles

Hello again. Sorry for the delay since I my last post. I have had a crazy couple of weeks, and have certainly "hit my stride" down here. Down to the hour, exactly one week from today I will leave Chile and head home for Christmas. In all honesty, this will probably be my last post, as nothing really interesting is going to be happening in the next 7 days and I expect it to be a very busy time. Allow me to start off by saying that this has been one of the most interesting and unique 2 week stretches of my life. Before I go into any description of my travels, I have some other things to write about.
Chile is a very family-oriented society, at all levels of class. . In poorer areas, family ties are important for all the same reasons they are anywhere else. In wealthier families, however, it's unique among my experiences, including my time in India which is also avery family centered place. One thing that is unlike anything I've experienced before is that wealthy families have lots and lots of children. Jaime, a man who works in my office, has 5 children between the ages of 11 and 2. He was the first father I met, and I was impressed by the size of his family. Seeing that I was impressed, he correctly guessed that I didn't know much about Chilean familial ties. He then proceeded to explain, and these numbers are no longer abnormal sounding to me after meeting other people in the month or so since this conversation took place, that his sister is one of 9, her mother one of 8, her father one of 6. She has 72 first cousins (meaning, her grandmother has 72 grandchildren), and her parents have an annual Christmas party for all the first cousins, their spouses, and their children. This is an indoor and outdoor party (don't forget, this is Christmas in the middle of the summer, imagine Christmas in July, I just had Thanksgiving in May and it was lovely)-- and it's a good thing that it's indoor/outdoor, because 250 people come. It's really absurd, and its the opposite of the typical effect of having a successful career in the USA-- here, when you have a good job, like working in the office where I work, you basically settle down and have a kid every 2 years for the next 10 or 15.
So, anyway, all that to say-- Chile is an extremely family oriented place, to the extreme that I've found it very hard to make friends with people. In general, social circles are limited to high school buddies and your immense network of cousins, and the drive to get out there and meet other people just doesn't really exist. While here, my main social interfaces, other than just like walking up to people on the street, are these: I'm working in an office and living with a family.
I really like the people I'm working with, and have enjoyed the time in the office with them. However, it is a small office-- EcoSecurities only has 5 people working here. So, it's a small office, and no one does anything together after work (3 are married), and so no one has really taken me out on the town or shown the initiative to show me around or show me a good time. That's one thing that has been a bit strange to me, people from Santiago are perhaps the least patriotic city people I've ever encountered. Obviously, I'm interacting with a small sample, but in general the idea of "oh, there's this place you definitely need to see," or "there's a great indian restaurant over there," just doesn't seem to be the case here. Either that, or by coming down here alone after everythign that happened, I just seem so independent that it doesn't really occur to anybody that it would have been nice if someone had served as an ambassador and lended a hand. Again, people are extremely family oriented, and I think that's part of it.
So anyway, I come home to my family, where there is a 21 year old girl, 20 year old guy, and 12 year old girl. This, logically, would be where I would be able to reach out to other people my age. But... Jesu, the 21 year old, she just simply isn't very social at all. In the last month, she hasn't gone out with friends once, as far as I can tell. She's perfectly nice, but is definitely not the kind of girl who is going to take me out. Nicolas, her younger brother, is much more social by nature, and is extremely affable. He, however, is currently in between the equivalent of junior college and college, is very serious about his career, and is studying construction engineering. So, he's taking a semester off from school and is working long hours as a construction engineer on a massive Santiago freeway project. I'm not really sure what he does-- he's definitely not a "construction worker"-- but he's working like 60 hours a week, and when he's not working, he is spending time with his girlfriend of two years, Constanza. Thus, Nico hasn't been much of a source of activity either. As I mentioned in a previous post, the simple life that I've been leading down here has been soothing in a lot of ways after an extremely hectic 8 month period on 4 continents with 4 jobs and a big scare. I wake up, go to the gym every day, go to work, work a lot, until 7:30 at least, come home, have dinner with my family, and hang out and wind down with them most of the evening. However, I've had very limited support when it comes to anything that I'd like to do outside of the house or office. This time down here has been a real exercise in independence for me, and I'm not upset about it. I haven't been anywhere near this independent in a long time, certainly not since the first half of freshman year, and even then that was no where near as unsupported as this has been. I am really enjoying the work I am doing and the people I'm working with, and living with this family as well. It's been some very good time alone, just long enough to where I'm very excited to see my family and then friends again, and it's given me time to think about a lot of things as well as enjoy being thrown out of context again. I don't think I have a context anymore. It's not the thing that makes me happiest in the world, but it makes me happy like little else does, in a unique way, to walk down the streets of a city I have no business being in, listening to Johnny Cash or Bob Dylan or Cream.


So, the short version: 3 weeks ago, I realized that no one was going to, for better or worse, go out of their way to take me out and show me this place, and that I wasn't going to meet anyone who was going to travel with me. I accepted this, and decided to do it myself, so I spent the last week of November planning a road trip. After finding the one travel company that would rent a car to a 21 year old, I started looking at maps and reading guide books. Planning a road trip is a really exhausting process, especially if all the places you're going are places you've never been, and if you're travelling alone. After my experience, I have some recommendations:
1) For your sanity, start by making a skeleton-- plan one "can't miss" thing or destination for each day. Plan at least what cities you're going to sleep in, and then fill it in from there. Give yourself at least 20% longer to get anywhere than you think you need, and don't expect to feel like you have a carefully made plan when you hit the road and you'll be fine. When I got the car on Saturday morning, I knew where I was sleeping Saturday night and how I was going to get there, and after realizing that no amount of reading Lonely Planet was going to make me feel like I had any idea where I was going, I set out. It's a lot easier than it sounds.
2) If you're renting a car, and you're alone, consider taking along a little gas can with a few extra gallons of gas, just in case. Also, it's good to have food in the car. And for gods sake, it's a road trip and you have no one to talk to, make yourself some friggin legendary Road Trip Mix CDs. If you're driving in Chile for 10 hours a day, I also recommend that you bring sunscreen.
3) If you're driving through an area, and you look closely at your map and you see that you're about to pass through "La Reserva Nacional de las Chinchillas," the only remaining wild habitat of the Chilean Chinchilla, you must stop. It's a rule.

Okay, so onto the actual post (this is going to be very, very long. I apologize in advance. I've been waiting 2 weeks to write all this down.)

Feel free to open these maps up, if you actually want to follow my progress. All in all, I drove over 1500 kilometers in 3 days. There'll be no need to have the map there, but here they are if you want them:
Northern Map: http://www.turistel.cl/v2/secciones/mapas/ruteros/coquimbo.htm
Southern Map (Starting Point): http://www.turistel.cl/v2/secciones/mapas/ruteros/coquimbo.htm

So, after some planning, on Friday the 1st of November I left work a little early. I came home around 5, threw some clothes in my bag, and went to the grocery store. I thought it would be a good idea to have some emergency food, in case my car broke down, so I bought "Pan", which is bread, but it's more than bread-- it's the staple grain in Chile, every grocery store has a miniature pan-shop where they make bread, and keep it hot, and it's delicious. I didn't like it at first, but I'm used to it now and have sampled some different varieties. I really enjoy the fresh baked wheat bread, with a little cherry jam. But anyway, I got some bread, cheese, fruit, and some big bottles of water. As purely an emergency measure, I bought a pack of hotdogs in case I got stuck somewhere with no protein source. Now looking back, this was pretty ridiculous. I was pretty rarin' to go, and couldn't resist the idea of having an emergencies-only hotdog supply.

I said goodbye to my famiy (María Jesús, Nicolas, Jesu, and Valentina), and hopped on the subway and headed to the bus station. I got on to the next bus to Viña del Mar, the coastal resort in Chile, about 2 hours to the west of Santiago, and was on my way. I got into Viña at about 9 PM, checked into the first hostel that I found, left my baggage there but locked the door and hid my laptop under the mattress just to be a badass, and headed out for a night on the town. After walking around, an hour later I found myself at a restaurant called Margarita, having a very good burrito and drinking a.... water.
After Margarita, I continued walking around Viña, and around midnight found myself in the municipal casino. There are a few casinos in Chile, and Viña's is the most glamourous. Anyway, nothing really interesting about the casino, other than it seemed to me that everyone was losing and that no one cared-- not in the money-is-no-object way, but rather in the we-always-lose way. Especially with the card games. The dominance of the black jack dealers, it stung my face. I had actually never been inside a casino before, other than the ridiculous casino-ettes in and around the Death Valley area, and I quickly found out that I had very little interest in gambling. Most tables, the minimum bet was 5000 pesos, about 10 dollars. This was a little square pink chip, and most people casually threw a couple of these onto the table at the blackjack table where they were facing, as far as I could tell, a monolith of a dealer. I didn't stay too long, and eventually made my way back across the bay to the other end of town where I was staying. I was walking home on Valparaíso street, when I came across the first of many Teleton parties that I would encounter over the weekend. I stayed here for 2 hours, from 1-3 in the morning, and at 3 there were more people-- old, young, women, kids, etc-- at 3 than at 1.

The Teleton is really deserving of its own post, and one of the most wonderful things about this road trip was that it was an epic journey all over Chile played against the backdrop of the Teleton, which is kind of like... I seriously just sat here for 5 minutes trying to finish that sentence. The Teleton is unlike anything I've ever seen before-- it grips the nation, it's all anyone talks about, it's the Super Bowl--- and it's a Telethon. It's a nationwide fundraising effort for children's hospitals, and it's nothing less than a phenomenon. On TV, Teleton related adds are like midterm elections: "Teleton: Necesitamos todo tu corazón." Imagine if the whole USA did a Relay for Life, and if every down you drove into had signs, banners, in windows and on lamp-posts, and you have some idea. Security guards, with little tvs, at 5 in the morning-- they're watching the Teleton.
http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=es&u=http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telet%25C3%25B3n_2006&sa=X&oi=translate&resnum=3&ct=result&prev=/search%3Fq%3Dteleton%2Bcorazon%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26client%3Dfirefox-a%26rls%3Dorg.mozilla:en-US:official%26hs%3DCCo%26sa%3DX

This is the Spanish Wikipedia Teletón page. The translation isn't very good, but hopefully you'll get an idea.

So anyway, there was a party in Viña, dancing in the street, with a great band on stage, and I stayed there for a while, enjoying myself much more than I had in the casino. At about 3, I went home, where I was very excited that the 13 dollars I had paid for my night in the hostel included breakfast, and I set the alarm for 6 hours later. I woke up to an admittedly mediocre breakfast, but it had hot coffee and cold pan. In a Chapman-Olive-would-be-proud moment, I took the bread and used it like a cover on the opening of the water thermos, successfully heating up my bread as I drank coffee in my underpants, watching the Teleton. It was on every channel, like a presidential speech in the 1950s. As I got dressed, I changed the channel to CNN, which was describing a huge snowstorm and the "abnormally cold weather" gripping the US, as I continued putting on my shorts.

By 10 AM, I was at (my future nemesis! Read on) Alamo Rent-A-Car, licking my chops, and 20 minutes later I had the keys and was driving. I was very excited, having not been behind the wheel of a car in a while; having finally shaken off the doldrums and made it outside of Santiago city limits, and with my road trip just beginning. I drove back to the hostel, picked up my luggage, and at about 11:30 I was out of Viña and on my way north. I forced myself to wait until on the highway to put my first mix CD in. I made 5, and they were both real and spectacular.

I was also very excited right at the beginning of my trip because this was my first time along the coast of Chile-- Santiago is in the middle of the country, and the seafood on the coast is legendary. So, I pulled over at a roadside stand and had a criminally cheap marisco empenada in Concón, with fresh squid, and then continued. North I went, through small towns like Quillota and La Calera, on my way to La Ligua.
So, once actually IN La Ligua, I parked the car, got out, and promptly continued eating myself into the next century by going to Lihuen Heladeria, which had been highly recommended somewhere. I asked for a little taste-piece of the raspberry ice cream, and promptly bit into at least the 2nd best, if not the best, ice cream I'd ever had in my life. I sweet-talked the owner, he gave me a taste of literally every flavor, and then I had a double, asked for it in a cup, and was pleasantly surprised when they stuck the cone on top anyway. Why don't they do that at home? I got two flavors-- Chirimoya and Swiss Chocolate, and was in heaven. There was another Teleton party in La Ligua, this one at 2 in the afternoon, still going from the night before. I continued on my way.

La Ligua is famous for its dulces-- little cakes with Manjar in them. La Ligua's dulces, you should be thinking Baltimore crabcakes, Cape Cod Clam Chowder, that sort of association. These plump little women stand bravely at the side of the highway with a basket of these things, and they frantically wave this long white flag. I pulled over on my way out of town, of course, with ice cream still on my face (!) and said hello. I asked for 1 sweet (hey, I already had a car full of hotdogs), and I offered her a 5,000 peso bill ($10) She looked at me like I was crazy, and told me she couldn't change it. Remember-- this is the same amount of money that was the minimum bet at any cards table at the casino, only midnight the night before, where I was watching people lazily throw this away, and she looked at me like I had tried to buy a pack of gum with a 100 dollar bill. Pretty striking. Anyway, I apologized and told her that the smallest I had was a 1,000. She smiled, said don't worry about it (the way you might say "it's okay, keep the change"), which struck me as weird.... until she then proceeded to stuff about 35,000 dulces in a bag and waved me on. It was actually 6, but it was 6 times more than I was going to buy originally. A big fat slob, I continued on my way, feeling at this point like the very hungry caterpillar. Turns out, the sweets are very good. Unique-- the cake itself is bitter, but the filling is intensely sweet and creamy, so it's an interesting contrast. Each of the 6 had an entirely different look. I ate about 3 over the course of the next hour on my way to the Chinchilla reserve, and then couldn't even look at the bag anymore, so I tucked it in to the back seat and wondered what I was going to do with it. More on that later.

For map purposes, I continued North, La Ligua to Los Vilos, then going north-east through Illapel until I reached the Chinchilla Reserve in the late afternoon. I stopped at the ranger station, which has a "Nocturama": a humongous indoor Chinchilla habitat where day and night are reversed (Chinchillas are nocturnal), and so at 4 in the afternoon I was in the height of the Chinchilla day, watching them under low red light as they were absolutely crazy, including I also saw a mother Chinchilla with 5 fluffballs. I talked to what must be the world's foremost Chinchilla expert, the park ranger at this reserve, for like 30 minutes, about all things Chinchilla. Key breakdown: They live in families, each family has territory, and they usually have about 8 chinchillas per family. Chinchillas have, literally, the softest fur in the world, according to some objective measure, and have 20,000 hairs per square inch. We have one hair from each follicle-- they can have up to 15. They are also locked into an epic, never ending battle for resources with some desert rat, which is dramatically represented on the food-web in the ranger station by a mutual arrow between the chinchilla and the rat, prompting the famous Chilean parable, "Hey, it's a Chinchilla-eat-Rat world out there." I thoroughly enjoyed this man's company, and we just visited after all my questions were answered. He was born nearby (there is NOTHING nearby.) and grew up in the area (there is NOTHING in the area.), and is generally happy. After our conversation, a lightbulb went off: I offered him one of my remaining dulces, which he was only too happy to accept, and I went on my way, continuing north to Ovalle. Having been taking my time all day, I finally succeeded in getting myself extremely lost somewhere between Combarbalá and Monte Patria. At this point, I am about 4 hours driving away from La Ligua and her famous sweets. I pull over the car and ask a nice-looking man for some directions, telling him I'm on my way to Vicuña. He is very helpful, and afterwards I offer him another one of my sweets. I'm really enjoying this (have you read that Dave Eggers book?) and this one was really fun, because he totally didn't see it coming. Remember, I'm a pretty good distance from La Ligua at this point. Offering someone a fresh sweet from La Ligua in this situation would be like if you were walking around in Maryland and some guy pulled over, asked for directions, and then gave you a fresh cheesesteak from Philly that he had just happened to pick up on the way down. I'm basically convinced it made his day. I finally pulled into Ovalle at 8PM, about 3 hours behind schedule. No worries, I thought, because I'm only 120 kilometers from Vicuña, my final destination. I pressed on, eating dinner in the car (Pan and Cheese, saving the hot dogs for the emergency I knew was coming), continuing to listen to great music, and making good time on my way to Vicuña, until the pavement ran out. With about 50 miles to go.

3 hours later, I pulled into Vicuña. This driving was actually some of the most fun driving I've done in a long time, but it was not fast. At this point, I've gone from the lush central valley to the arid "Norte Chico" where lives the fierce Chilean Chinchilla, but now I'm entering a valley region that is one of the centers of wine-grapes in Chile. All of the sudden, it's beautiful and green again, and I'm driving on a dirt road in Chilean wine country, through small towns, composed entirely of people who pick grapes for a living, and the sun is setting. All of the sudden, I'm in one of those towns small enough where you naturally wave from the steering wheel and get a wave back. Here, in the first couple of towns, I saw some intensely, almost unsettlingly beautiful women, walking down the side of the road in this idyllic setting. Dark, dark hair and eyes, beautiful skin, simply some of the most beautiful women I've ever seen, the kind you want to just pull over and say "Marry me, we'll have a vineyard and tanned barefoot children with white teeth and dusty faces and fresh, green chili salsa with cilantro. I'll read you Borges. I'll read you Borges in Spanish. Please."

After the sun went down, it was just me and this intensely winding road, for about 2 hours, making me realize that I had forgotten how much I like driving. Finally, I arrive in Vicuña, about 380 miles from where I started. Vicuña is a very small town 2,000 people or so, nestled in the heart of the Valley Elqui, a grape-growing powerhouse. The only reason I decided to come to Vicuña, although I'm now glad I did for other reasons, was because it is the site of several scientific astronomical observatories. As a thank you to the town for its efforts to reduce light pollution, these observatories put some money together and donated a relatively small facility for the municipality, for tourism purposes. The science ones are, (world wide and as a rule), basically never open to the public. Observatorio Mamalluca (don't ask), however, was built precisely to be open to the public. One thing I had been excited about for coming down to South America was to see a whole new set of constellations, but Santiago is so massive that you can't really see anything. So, Vicuña is one of the best places to go to see the stars in the whole world, so I made it my destination. I arrived Saturday night and checked into another hostel, recommended by my guidebook ("Owners are perfectly civilized"). This time, however, I really had an unexpectedly delightful time. The owner, Ricardo, and I hit it off immediately. He's an old Argentine, and was just a lovely person. We sat up until 2, talking, in his beautiful hostel. I'm sad to say that I didn't take any photos of it. It rains so infrequently that the sitting room of the hostel simply has no roof. So, we sat there, under the stars, chatting, and finally I went to bed exhausted. The next morning, Ricardo cooked me a delicious breakfast, with literally perfect eggs. At that moment, I decided I would stay with Ricardo another night, and he repeated this feat the next morning-- perfect eggs. "These eggs are perfect, Ricardo." "Thank you. You know, there's just a point, you have to be able to see it."
After sleeping in late and then breakfast and more talking with Ricardo, I got up and went to the observatory's office to make an appointment for late that night, and having secured this, I got in the car (emergency food supplies still holding out!) and at about 1 in the afternoon I headed east. The road east doesn't really go anywhere. After an hour in the valley, it forks. The south fork runs out, and the north fork is a pass into Argentina that is closed 10 months of the year due to snow. It's a 5,000 meter high pass, called "El Paso de Agua Negra." I'm pretty sure that's the manliest thing I've ever heard. It would be nice to get up there with an empty bottle, so you could bottle liquid manliness. Anyway, first I went south, to a little town called Pisco Elqui, known as the birthplace of Gabriela Mistral (Nobel prize winning female poet). I made an appointment to tour a Pisco distillery called Tres Erres, which is a famous brand in Chile. Pisco is the national liquor of Chile. It's made from grapes and is extremely strong, up to 90 proof. It has a unique taste, like a grappa but slightly different. Pisco experts drink it on ice, or even better, straight but cold, keeping the bottle in the freezer. Normal people drink Pisco Sours, which are generally sold pre-mixed but can be made at home. They're made with 2 parts pisco, 1 part lemon juice, and powdered sugar. Also, most people use a little egg-white to make them foam a little. It's kind of like people who drink Gin martinis, and people who drink gin and tonics. While waiting for my tour at 3R, I went to another distillery, called Fundo Los Nichos, which was of an entirely different stripe. Tres Erres is small, but nationally known and nationally available. It's on the shelf of the grocery store in Santiago I go to. Fundo Los Nichos is much smaller than this-- they only sell out of their little bodega at the entrance to the distillery. It's the oldest distillery in the Elqui valley, founded in 1853, and only 6 people work there. Everything is done by hand, and it's a really cool spot. It is called "Fundo Los Nichos" because the original owner intentionally spread stories that there were ghosts in the cellar to prevent people from sneaking in and stealing the Pisco. I talked to the woman working there for a while and then headed over to Tres Erres, where I took a tour of the distillery itself. Earlier on my trip here, I had the opportunity to tour a wine vineyard near Santiago, which was a very cool experience, and this was interesting as well. I bought a bottle to bring home of Tres Erres most lauded Pisco, which is aged twice as long as everything else. I'm going to take it to New York, and share it with some idiots I know.
North: I drove towards the paso de agua negra for a few hours, relishing the change in scenery. I'm more and more aware as I write all this down how inadequate a job I'm doing of describing all of the notable things that I saw. One of them that is perhaps the hardest to describe is the change in vegetation that occurs as you drive through Chile. Since it is so vertically oriented, and is bordered by the ocean on the west and some really intense mountains to the east, Chile's climate changes extremely rapidly as you move from north to south. As I was driving, every hour it felt like I was in a completely different ecosystem. From the fertile central area of Santiago, to the arid Chico Norte, into lush valleys fed by Andean Snowmelt, arid again but a different, scrubbier kind of desert much like Idaho, I finally ended up in Vicuna, which was extremely lush and beautiful. As I drove east, however, towards and up into the Andes proper, the change was even more sudden and breathtaking. As I climbed in elevation and entered the mountains, all of the sudden I was in an extremely dusty, vertical, geologically interesting area. I was the only car on the road, and was driving up this drainage for about 50 miles, alone, as the mountains got more and more impressive. A little higher, and to my surprise the valley widened and there was rdera sizeable stream as I drew nearer to the b. Finally, I reached a point where I could actually see the high mountains that separate Chile from Argentina at this point in front of me, all colors of amber and grey and covered with snow, like a fortress. Soon thereafter, the carabineros had a station and said I needed to turn around, so I did. The sun began to settle in front of me as I made my way back west towards Vicuna, slowly snaking my way out of the Cordillera, and though I knew it was coming, the transition from this high, brutal clime to the idyllic green Valle Elqui was no less shocking the second time. I returned to Vicuna just in time to stop by and say hello to Ricardo, drop some things off in the room, and walk over to the Observatory's office, where I waited for the bus that took me the 10 miles up the wall of the valley to the observatory. I spent Sunday night at the Observatory, looking at the southern constellations. It was a full moon, which was a bummer in some ways because it was too bright to see some of the smaller, more dim clusters, but this was somewhat trivial as the observatory's telescope is not very powerful by scientific observation standards. Highlights included watching Sirius, the brightest star there is, rise over the neighboring mountain ranges. Sirius is much brighter than Polaris, the north star, which appears brightest in the northern hemisphere due to the fact that Sirius, where visible, is at an extremely low angle. It was quite a sight. The moon, however, was truly a spectacle, and I got to look at a full moon at 100x magnification. I took some pictures through the telescope with my camera, which worked surprisingly well, and these pictures are part of the photo album that I will eventually upload with photos from these journeys I took. I was up at the observatory until late, and then came home and went to bed. Sunday was a very low-key day in between two days of a lot of driving, but one in which I managed to go up into the Andes, visit a very cool Pisco town, and see the stars and moon at one of the best places on Earth. I recommend having a day like this in between. Saturday, I saw so much, and took in so much of the landscape, it was almost overwhelming, and having 3 days like that in a row would have blunted the whole experience. Monday morning, I got up early and had a good long talk with Ricardo and a second perfect breakfast including the best avocado I've ever had. This wasn't one of those times like when you go somewhere specifically to have the best ____ you've ever had, and you get hyped up which is half the fun, and then the hype and the good food kind of mix in your mind. This was totally unexpected, just sitting there on the table, sliced up, and it blew me away. Ricardo and I exchanged email addresses and said our goodbyes, and I headed out to the car.
That's when I realized that my car had been broken into sometime the night before. This was the only low point of my road trip. The casualties: The faceplate of the CD player and my rental car agreement, which I gleefully brushed off (thinking at the time that I wouldn't have to pay for it). After congratulating myself for keeping all my valuables with me in my luggage, I realized that I had left my grandfather's 35 year old aviators, the original Ray Bans, in the car, and that they were gone. I chalked it up as a casualty of just flinging myself out there like this and got in the car and drove away. The drive out of Vicuna Monday was very different than the drive out Sunday, where I had been driving east, wearing my aviators and blasting music on the stereo. This time, I drove west, squinting in the daylight, listening to music on my iPod, and thinking about what a big idiot I was. However, things could have been much worse-- inside was my passport, my camera, my laptop, and other things of import. If any or a combination of those things had been left in the car and then taken, I would have probably never forgiven myself. The thief, having ransacked my car, took my sunglasses, the rental car agreement, and Road trip mixes 2 and 4. He passed over, however, on my sunscreen and discs 1,3, and 5. So, if you are ever in a little Chilean town called Vicuna, and you see a guy with pretty amazing sunglasses but a sunburned nose and a penchant for even numbers, be sure to shoot him a thumbs up for me. Onward and westward!
I continued to La Serena, "the" big town of the Norte Chico. Having been told that it was great, I forced myself to drive around for 20 minutes before deciding it was really boring, and then I got on legendary Ruta 5, (think Route 66), the Pan Americana, which is part of a highway all the way from the southern tip of South America to Alaska. In Chile, the PA snakes along the coast. Both La Serena and Vina del Mar are on the ocean, and I designed my route so that I could see two different sides of the country by taking the interior roads on my way up and this iconic highway on the way back. I saw a lot more of the ocean on my way home, but I also drove a lot faster. After several hours on unpaved roads, the speed of a highway is a little unsettling. I blasted out of La Serena at almost 80 miles an hour, listening to some of those great tunes I won't shut up about, and barreled south, tangent to the ocean with the windows down.

For an idea of the music I was listening to, here's the tracklist of one of the CDs. This is Disc 5:
1) Head Home, Midlake
2) Rocks Off, The Rolling Stones
3) Off The Record, My Morning Jacket
4) Under the Bridge, Red Hot Chili Peppers
5) Portland Oregon, feat. Jack White, Loretta Lynn
6) California Waiting, Kings Of Leon
7) Runnin' Kind, Merle Haggard
8) She's Not There, Santana
9) High And Dry, Radiohead
10) No More Birthdays, Sound Team
11) Scuttle Buttin', Stevie Ray Vaughan & Double Trouble
12) Baltimore Johnny, The Del McCoury Band
13) Torture Me, Red Hot Chili Peppers
14) Clocks, Coldplay
15) Ain't No Easy Way, Black Rebel Motorcycle Club
16) The Bends, Radiohead
17) Where The Streets Have No Name, U2
18) Such Great Heights, The Postal Service

Monday was a driving day, as would be expected by spending it on the highway rather than the smaller roads, where I made innumerable little stops that were fun but aren't worth writing about. (Some of them may or may not have been executed simply so that I could leave the car door open, turn up the volume, and dance the jig in a particularly jig-worthy spot.) I decided, therefore, that I would make one big stop between La Serena and Vina del Mar, taking in the rest of it from the car. I made my stop in Guanaqueros, a small and ancient fishing village on the Pacific coast. I ended up staying there for 3 hours or so, really taking the time to explore and get a feel for this little spot. It was the only little town where I took many photos, and my photos of dogs in Guanaqueros will have to serve as ambassadors for the rest of the true characters that I encountered on my travels. Guanaqueros is, like many communities in Chile, cut into hillsides. The hills run basically right into the ocean, so as the community grew (it didn't grow much, it's tiny, but I'm guessing the first houses were right on the water), successive rows of homes were cut into the steep hillside. The roads are thus parallel to the beach, and all the houses face west, looking out into the ocean. The hillsides are so steep, in other words, that there aren't two sides to every street. The street is cut into a terrace a level above the previous row of houses, so that if you stand on the road and look towards the ocean, you could literally step from the road onto the roof of the house on the level below. It's like stadium seating, basically-- the back of everyone's house is dug out of the ground, and no one has eastward windows. It was a perfect day, clear and a little windy, and I got the impression that there was a healthy community of old folks in Guanaqueros. I walked around this radially symmetrical city, radiating like a seashell uphill around the main ocean dock, and found every house with windows open and simple fabric curtains. Lots of people were listening to the radio, to a soccer game, enough so that acontinual-broadcast was in effect-- as I walked, it was like having a radio with me as I passed from house to house. After a little while, I decided to head into a restaurant and have some of the seafood Guanaqueros is famous for. Since I had never been before, and will likely never be again, there was realistically no way to decide which restaurants would be good and which wouldn't. There were a few to choose from, and so I just decided to go to a place called "Los Buenos Muchachos", deciding it would make a good story either way. Well, the name on the sign was a lie, because there was only one buen muchacho working at los buenos muchachos (other than a very lazy spaniel of some kind, sleeping on the porch, who must have been the other. He certainly qualified.) When I walked in, the place was empty, and el soltero muchacho was watching TV. He asked me if I wanted lunch, and I said yes please. He asked if I would have the plate of the day, and I said oh, yes, of course. He then got up and went into the kitchen and started making it. I sat down and started thinking about christmas presents, and I swear that guy spent 30 minutes making my lunch. When he brought it out, it knocked my socks off. Very simple, fresh, fried fish, with good vegetables. One of the best fish dishes I've ever had. I was now in awe, in disbelief at my good fortune at choosing such a place. After the meal, I asked this nice old man what he had served me. When he responded, he said enough words that I realized that he had almost no teeth. I also realized that I couldn't understand a damn word he was saying. So, I went to a small, remote fishing village in Chile, waltzed into a restaurant with a misleading title, had the best fish of my life, and its name will forever be a mystery to me because the cook/waiter/owner had no teeth and I couldn't understand him. Maybe it's better this way.
After leaving Guanaqueros, I basically made my way all the way back to Vina Del Mar, taking Ruta 5 most of the way and then, when it veers inland to go to Santiago, I took a smaller highway that really hugged the coastline for the last 50 km or so. I arrived back at the rental place, explained what happened with the radio, was shocked to find out that I had to pay for a new one, and had a completo and made my way back to Santiago on the bus again. Final tallies: 3 days, over 1500 kilometers, and finally some idea of what chile looks like. The experience, as a whole, of finally deciding to just road trip it by myself and then launching into it, is something I'll never forget. It makes me want to come back and spend a summer in a car in South America. For that, however, I would certainly need a partner in crime.
A completo, what's that you ask? A completo is the fast food of choice in Chile, functioning a lot like a single slice in new york. A completo is a hot dog, but elaborately presented. Basically, a completo is a hot dog in a too-big bun that is full of other things. You put all the other ingredients in the bun and then throw the whole contraption on the grill, to allow everything to heat up, mix, and the like. It's pretty delicious, and I'm excited to know about the Completo as a platform for future experiments. I've never seen a hotdog re-grilled in the bun before, but it makes a lot of sense. My favorite completo is "The Italian", so named because of the colors of its ingredients-- diced tomatoes, fresh avocado, and a little mayonnaise.
I got back to Santiago at about Midnight Monday night, made my way back to my house, and collapsed into bed. I went to work on Tuesday, worked all day, and then Wednesday morning I got up and got on a plane to go to the South for another short trip, this one being for business Wednesday and Thursday and then more exploration Friday through Monday morning. I think I'm going to save my description of that trip, which included a 2 day solo backpack in the Patagonian rainforest, for another post. For now, I'll conclude here with some unrelated observations and notes.

I've discovered a few other things that I really like about the Spanish language. One of them, probably my favorite new thing, is that Spanish is very word-economical, to an almost philosophically meaningful degree, when it comes to related concepts. As an example, the way that Spanish says things like "ice cream," "ice cream maker," and "ice cream store." Those things, in order, are helado, heladero, and heladeria. Maybe you see where I'm going with this, but I think it's really great that professions, places of business, and the thing being produced are so simply, deeply, and elegantly related, and that they all only have one word. We used to have words like this in English, but they are now old-fashioned and never used anymore. Vender is to sell, so a guy working at a shoe store is just called a "Vendedor." He's not a "retail team-member", he's not a "sales associate." He's a seller. We used to do this, by appending "smith" on the end of everything-- blacksmith, silversmith, etc, but these aren't used anymore. Here, Cafe means coffee, so Cafeteria means, you guessed it, Coffee Shop. Any idea what a Sandwicheria might be? Botelleria? I like the latter-- a botilleria is a liquor store, but the word makes it more like "bottle shop." Pescaderia, etc. We have one thing similar-- you can still find a "Hotdoggery" in some cities, but imagine if there was a single word, like Hotdoggery, for every single kind of store! It's really the best.
Also: Manzana is apple. Manzano is apple tree. Naranja, Naranjos, Palta, Palto. I like that as well.

In Chile, every bridge, no matter how small, has a name. "Puente O'Higgins." I think this is really cute, similar to how small towns in Missouri all have their names proudly painted on the water towers. "Billings"! And, if its a REALLY small town, it also (this is kind of embarrassing) simply HAS to have the town's high school mascot on the water tower. This is a delicate balance, however, because it has to be a pretty small town to be that hyped up about high school sports, but it has to be big enough to have a water tower big enough that the words "Aurora, Home of the Houn' Dawgs" will fit on there. (That, by the way, is a real place, in Missouri about 40 minutes from my house, and that's really their mascot, apostrophe and d-a-w-g-s included. Look it up.)


Bathrooms here, they say "Damas" and "Varones". This, loosely translated, means "Dames" and "Roosters." I like that as well.


Thanks for reading all this. I hope it was at least somewhat interesting. As a conclusion, here was my favorite thing about my trip:

When I got to the Valle Elqui, the most celebrated Pisco district, I was immediately stricken by a couple of things. First, I think there is something very charming about a place that is, for all intents and purposes, wine country, but whose product is something that is basically a working-man's liquor, both strong and fast-acting. It had all the cool things about wine country-- idyllic landscapes, rolling plantations, fascinating local economies-- but with none of the bullshit and a healthy dose of working-class ethos. It's a less snobby version, and it's much more appealing. Plus, it's humorous that these people are growing something so strong. While wine is tame and flavor is the main focus, growing pisco grapes is like having a farm of whiskey-trees.

The other thing though, and this was an image I'll never forget, is that as I drove down into Pisco Elqui on Sunday and peered down into the valley from the road, I realized that everything built by people-- houses, roads, businesses-- they were all up on the walls of the valley. In this area, the soil is very fertile, so the determining factor is water. Where there is water, it is lush, thick, green. Without water, however, it is extremely arid and scrubby. Thus, these Pisco valleys were really cool because the valley floor was the very picture of agriculture, but the walls of the valleys looked like Idaho. So, water flows down the valley floor, and as a result (these are glacial valleys, so they're wide and flat), the area between the walls of the valley is beautiful and extremely productive. And, you see these human establishments, pushed up onto the walls of the valley, and all of the sudden its obvious-- it reflects the fact that the valley itself is the main event, pushing everyone else to the margins. The farmers, respectful of the productivity of the valley, don't waste good land with houses, yards, etc, so their houses can be found, almost reverentially, in a giant circle, elevated, enclosing the valley and grape production. So, the valley itself is like a big theater in the round, and the way the perhaps-subconscious urban plan reflected the livelihood of the people was really special to see.

Saturday, November 18, 2006

Searching for the gridiron

The title of this post reflects my unfortunate search for somewhere, anywhere, to watch the Michigan OSU game last Saturday. I walked around all over Las Condes, went into 20 bars. Found plenty of attractive bartenders, but nary a TV with any American channels. The search continued. I called TGIFriday's-- which, yes, sadly, exists here (and, for some strange reason, is not called "GADHE Viernes!") I called Ruby Tuesdays. No, they said.

I, George Olive, walked into a Hooters. Futbol norteamericano? Un partido muy importante, en ABC?
"No," contestaron las tetas.

I banged on the door of the US Embassy. This was after 2 hours. "No," said Closed-Doors. "It's Saturday. This is an Embassy. Are you out of your mind?"

Anyway:

First half: Saturday, 11/18/06
Thought I'd post again. Things are going very well. I've just completed my first full week at work, and am enjoying an absolutely lovely Saturday afternoon in Santiago. It's incredibly hard to type on a Latin American keyboard-- all the punctiation is in the wrong place, and I can't get used to it, so starting now Im not going to worry about it or this post is going to take forever. At work, we are preparing for a very important day. Before I explain, maybe I should say a little something about what we do. And before I do that, Ill say what Im doing right now... listening to the Michigan and Ohio St game on the radio, drinking a nice cold Heineken, and sitting in the family room using the family computer. Life is good.

So anyway, for now, Im working for a company called EcoSecurities. As the name suggests, this is one of those firms that operates in the area in between environmental science and economics. The Kyoto protocol is the worldwide global warming treaty that is in effect until 2012. The most important things about it are that it was the first worldwide binding agreement, and that it makes a distinction between the emissions of developing and already industrialized nations. Even now, after several years of explosive economic and industrial growth in India and China, 70 percent of the manmade emissions in the atmosphere right now are from the USA and Europe. These emissions are both recent and a legacy of the Industrial revolution in those areas. So, 70% of the global warming that has already happened is our fault, not theirs, and this was recognized in the framing of the Kyoto protocol in the 1990s. Kyoto places binding limits on these economies, with the goal of getting them back down to below their 1990 levels before 2012. Kyoto has no limitations on the developing world, which will becoming increasingly problematic in the future as the sheer size of the developing economies of the world contributes to more and more significant emissions from those nations. Right now, in Nairobi, there is a UN meeting that is seeking to draw up plans for the next Kyoto, to begin after 2012. Already, China is very transparently coming out in opposition to any binding cuts in the developing world. This is both understandable and problematic. Hopefully, China is putting on a strong front, knowing that limitations are inevitable, and is holding out for some sort of compensation for its emissions limitations. In any case, right now there are no limitations on emissions from the developing world.
As part of Kyoto, it was recognized that reducing emissions is of equal value everywhere. Less CO2 from Namibia is equally valuable as the same amount of reductions from the USA. This is because CO2 is well mixed in the atmosphere... when you drive to the grocery store, within a few days the CO2 that you just created will be pretty evenly distributed worldwide. This is unlike the situation with a pollutant like sulfur, which remains localized and produces acid rain. This is why acid rain was a problem in New England, and is currently a problem in China, but was never a problem in Des Moines.
So, since CO2 emissions are non'local, Kyoto was formulated to allow nations some flexibility in reducing their emissions. >The most relevant mechanism to this discussion by which this flexibility was realized is called CDM, or the Clean Development Mechanism. The nations that have to reduce their emissions are called the Annex 1 nations. Annex 1 countries, like Germany, have the option of fulfilling part of their emissions reductions by doing projects in the developing world. As I mentioned above, emissions reductions are, from the climates point of view, equally valuable no matter where they take place. So, a project to, lets say, reduce CO2 emissions from tire factories in Senegal is just as good as moving all of NYCs taxi fleet to Hybrids. Speaking of which, why the hell hasnt THAT happened yet. So anyway, this is the area where EcoSecurities does business. Heres how it works in detail, but the basic story is that EcoSecurities does all the work and then sells the rights to a project to an industrial nation, who has the choice of either sponsoring such projects or meeting their emissions reductions targets entirely through the reduction of emissions in their own nation. Often, it is most cost effective to do a mix of these two strategies.

Heres what we do.

First, we talk to some sort of economic agent in a developing country. This person could be a small business owner, it could be thew regional manager of a global corporation, it could be the mayor of a city in Indonesia. The point is, this person has an influence in some sort of economic activity. We approach this person and we start talking about doing a project to reduce emissions.


Secondly, we get into project design. A key economic aspect of this process is that we pay this person to reduce his emissions. Thats the whole idea, to create financial incentives to reduce emissions. Another key economic aspect of this is that the emissions reduction project cannot be profitable in and of itself. ER = Emissions Reductions. An example of an ER project that would be profitable would be to move the NYC taxi fleet from the Crown Royal to Prius. This, since they could provide exactly the same level of service with a much lower fuel cost, would increase substantially the profits of taxi drivers. Why cant we do projects like this? Because, you can expect an economy to exploit opportunities like this on its own, its only a matter of when. So, if Germany were to throw a bunch of money at NYC to get them to move to a Prius taxi fleet, this would have the effect of lining the pockets of taxi drivers but the key change, a move to a hybrid taxi, would be profitable on its own.

So, we find a project that would be unprofitable in a business as usual scenario. A good example is landfill gas. Landfills, which are full of organic matter, produce methane and just leak it into the atmosphere. This is a pretty serious source of global warming, because methane is much worse than CO2 when it comes to trapping heat. So, anyway, you can capture this methane and use it for fuel, but its more expensive to do so than to just find it in the ground like normal. So, we talk to a company in Brazil and set up a system like this. For every cubic foot of methane they capture and sell, they will have two sources of income... they get to sell the natural gas at the market price, but then WE also pay them some amount, lets say 10' dollars, because every bit of methane they produce this way prevents the combustion of new methane from in the ground, which means that it reduces emissions. So, they throw a big plastic bag over the top of a landfill, capture the methane, and sell it. With the money they get from us, this becomes a profitable enterprise. So how can we afford it? Because, we

INTERCEPTION MICHIGAN!!!!!!!!!!!!

eventually sell this project to someone like Germany, for 12 dollars a cubic foot, and we make some money and Germany saves some money. So, its a win win win win. The world has less emissions, theres a transfer of wealth from Germany to Brazil, Germany saves money, and we stay in business. How is this a good idea for Germany? Because its cheaper for them to stop methane emissions in Brazil than it is to impose super expensive regulations on their power industry.

So, thats what we do... reduce emissions in the developing world in a profit maximizing way. Jealous?

Ok, that took forever and Im tired, so I'm going to talk about this meeting later.

UPDATE:

Second half done, 11/24/06

So, this company is one of the few that operates exclusively in this field. This business can be separated into two parts—project origination and credit commercialization. As an analogy, this is like separating the bread industry into two parts, one of which is where wheat is planted, harvested, and baked, and the other is the packaging and bringing to market of the final product. A lot of companies are involved on either side of this equation, but EcoSecurities is one of the only ones that is involved in the whole process—both doing the projects that create carbon credits, and bringing those credits to market.

That’s why they have offices where they do—one HQ in England, where all the trading/commercialization happens, and lots of regional offices in developing countries worldwide, where the projects are undertaken.

The office where I work in Santiago handles all project opportunities in Chile, Peru, Ecuador, and Colombia—all of the South American countries that border the Pacific Ocean. It is a small office, only about 5 people plus me. Next week, 3 of them will be in Colombia on a research trip, and I’ll be here working on long-term projects for the company. Right now, my main projects are:

Writing a guide to project origination. The UN has approved lots of different ways to reduce emissions and earn credits. These are called methodologies. There are about 40 of them, and in some places they are only subtly different from one another. The goal is to go through them very carefully and develop some rules of thumb to help choose how to file a project out of several, seemingly applicable methodologies. (For instance, there are no less than five methodologies about capturing methane that escapes from landfills as waste decays.) Also, I’ll be writing a brief summary of the methodologies. This is good for me because I’ll learn a ton about the different methodologies and how they work, and it’s good for the company because it will help people to get a basic familiarity with all of the methodologies without sitting down to read them all. They’re written in a nice, confusing mixture of technological gibberish and UN-level bureaucratic language. Most of the people in the company are intimately familiar with a couple of the methodologies because they’ve done projects of those types, but they might know nothing about the other types. This project is for the England office, which means that it is going to be valuable company wide.

Doing research on the South American countries that we’re in charge of. This office is very young, only 14 months old. We were just put in charge of Colombia, Peru, and Ecuador very recently. The 5 people that work here permanently are 3 Chileans, a Venezuelan, and an American—in other words, none of them are from the other countries. So, all this to say, they don’t know nearly as much, or as many people, in those other countries as they do in Chile, and they need to know more. So, I’m going to be conducting some research into the economies of these countries, trying to find answers to questions that will help them to successfully enter those markets. The information that is important is the info that will help us to gauge which approaches will be best in each country. We need to be able to talk to businesses, make proposals/negotiate, and actually build the projects. So, the kinds of things I’m going to be looking for:

How much renewable/low emissions capacity do you already have in these countries? Where is it? Who owns it?

Who are the best law firms/construction companies/energy companies in these countries?

How competitive are these markets? How many energy companies operate in Lima, Peru? What energy sources do they use?

And so on and so forth. I’m really looking forward to doing this, and I think it’ll be really interesting to start answering these questions.


As promised, I’ll now return to the California Delegation.

So, California is the 6th or 7th biggest economy in the world. California’s GDP is about 1.5 trillion dollars a year. Their emissions of Carbon Dioxide are on the order of roughly 500 million metric tons per year. This is a lot, but it’s not an absurdly high amount. Texas clocks in at about 600. The European Union is around the 3000 mark. However, what makes CA unique is that they are the biggest economy that is not involved in any Global Warming treaty. Most other economies, developed or developing, are involved in some way in reducing carbon emissions. Obviously, this is happening on a more meaningful scale in some countries than others, but the point is that most countries in the world are either industrialized and limiting their emissions because they agreed to, or industrializing and at the same time implementing some of these projects I’m talking about. Since California is part of the US, it is considered part of a Kyoto Annex-1 country even though the US never signed Kyoto. As such, it is not eligible for CDM projects, meaning that the things EcoSecurities does in Chile, or Malaysia, it could not do in California.

Schwarzenegger recently passed a landmark law—AB 32—which set emissions reduction targets for California independent of federal US action. By the way, this response to the federal inaction on this issue is enlightening, and the fact that it’s necessary is embarrassing. In lieu of federal action, various US states, cities, and counties have pledged to meet the Kyoto targets anyway. Over 60 million Americans live in cities whose mayors have “signed” Kyoto. Including California, the number jumps to about 85 million (because some Californians already were covered by local policy.) So anyway, here is California’s plan. Emissions in California, like everywhere, are higher every year. They’re higher this year than last, and last year than the year before that. The only place in the world where emissions have fallen without intentional effort is in the Former Soviet Union, whose emissions are much lower now than they were in 1988 when they were so much more economically powerful. So, the plan:

By 2010, to get back down to 2000 emissions

By 2020, to get back down to 1990 levels

These are great, and are right there in line with Kyoto targets. But here’s the real deal:

By 2050, to be 80% below 1990 levels.

When you’re looking at numbers like these, it’s very easy to just gloss over them, but I want to stress (as a relative expert in this field) how remarkable that last target is.

The third target in California’s new law will require nothing less than an economic transformation, of one of the biggest and most advanced economies in the world.

Let me put it in perspective for you:

In 1990, CA emissions were about 420 million metric tons, or MMMT. That means that in 2050, they hope to clock in at roughly 84 MMMT.

California’s population is currently 33 million. Let’s say, to be extremely conservative, that it increases to 45 million by 2050. 84 MMMT/45,000,000 is less than 2 tons per person.

Two tons per person! There are a couple of ways to look at this number.

Emissions distribution. California’s current emissions are roughly 15 tons per person, annually. This, however, is the average—this includes lots of poor people that don’t have big, energy-wasting houses or Hummer H2s… that don’t fly from LA to Sacramento on business twice a week… etc. In other words, another way of looking at it is that one way for California to achieve its emissions reductions is for everybody to reduce their emissions by about 90 percent. Sure, it would be easy for someone like Kobe Bryant to make a big cut in his emissions, but a lot of people already drive fuel efficient cars, live in very modest houses, and don’t generally have a lot of wasteful emissions. As my dad says, “you can’t milk a turnip,” and so the idea of already conservative people cutting by 90 percent seems, to me, extremely unlikely. Thus, this means that to meet this target, more affluent folks are going to probably have to cut by even more than 90 percent over the next 40 years. Making no bones about it, this basically means that everything in California is going to change. It’s absolutely fascinating.

Absolute value of 2 tons of emissions. Just to put it in perspective, if you get 30 miles per gallon (I bet you get less than that), and you drive your car 5,000 miles a year (I bet you drive more than that)…

You’ve already used up your two tons.

So, for you, no flying! No cooking! No heating or cooling! No eating!

So, to put it bluntly, here’s how I look at it.

Emissions are a function of 2 variables: level of economic activity, and carbon intensity of economic activity, multiplied together.


E = A * C

In the long run, for global warming to stop, “net emissions” have to be zero. This doesn’t mean that there can’t be any emissions, just that there have to be negative emissions along with positive emissions. How do you have negative emissions? You either have to turn CO2 back into oxygen, or you have to get rid of it. Best way to do that is to stop chopping down the rainforest and let it grow back.

By the way, while I’m on the subject, just so you know: from a global perspective, emissions of CO2 are so large that they are measured in Gigatons of Carbon, or GtC.

The TOTAL CO2 emissions that result from every car on earth, every coal plant on earth… every airplane, every breathing human being, and every beanie baby factory, is about 6.2 gigatons of carbon emissions per year.

The total amount of CO2 released due to tropical deforestation every year is 2 gigatons.

In other words, on top of all anthropogenic sources of emissions, we throw in another 33% by not preventing rainforest destruction. Best way to prevent rainforest destruction? Rent the rainforests, pay people not to chop them down. Don’t want to pay some Brazilian the few dollars it costs to make rainforest maintenance more profitable than cattle ranching on former rainforested land? I challenge you to find a more cost effective way to cut Global Warming substantially.

Next best way to do that, in the future, will be Carbon sequestration—taking CO2 out of the air, change-phase, and store it somewhere. Turn it into a liquid and inject it into lakes in Antarctica (seriously). Or, turn it into basaltic rock deposits and store it in veins of olivine. Stuff like that. This process is neither free nor simple, but it also doesn’t defy the laws of thermodynamics:

By combusting fossil fuels, you release much more energy than you need to take the resulting CO2 and stick it back in the earth. (Note: I did not say that you release more energy than you need to restore the bonds in the original hydrocarbon molecules.)

Here’s the other thing—in the future, to not only stop global warming but to get things back to the way they were before the Industrial Revolution, we’re going to have to have NEGATIVE net emissions for a long time. Kinda like you have to have negative caloric intake after the holidays.

So, global warming stops when E = L * C = 0. In other words, it stops when either:

The level of economic activity is 0, or;

The net carbon intensity of economic activity is 0.

Which do you prefer?

For California to meet its targets, it’s going to require an economic transformation of an enormous magnitude. It is not facetious to say that this transformation will be of a similar significance to the transformation that occurred when electricity was invented. Or, the transformation that occurred when the semiconductor, and then the internet, was invented. In other words, it will be nothing short of an economic revolution. And, the coolest thing is, if it happens in California, it can happen everywhere. Making California basically carbon neutral is not nearly as easy as it is to make, say, Palo Alto carbon neutral. PA has a population of about 50,000 really rich people. They could probably re-plant enough trees to make Palo Alto’s emissions completely disappear from the atmosphere. But, that’s not going to cut it in California. In the long run, California is going to have to find a way to dramatically reduce the coefficient of the carbon intensity of industry. That means that they’re going to have to find a new way to do basically everything. It also means they’re going to just have to stop doing some things. In other words, Global Warming might be the thing that has finally forced a major economy to reinvent itself in a globally sustainable way. And that makes this, the first half of the twentieth century, probably the most economically fascinating time to live in since the first Industrial Revolution.

That’s about all I have to say. I consider that more important than listing copious details about the actual meeting we had with the people from California. Basically, the meeting was a chance for us to argue that California would need to participate in similar, international carbon projects, especially in the short term, as a way of injecting some flexibility into their “compliance path” over the next 46 years. We had some very important people down here, including Schwarzenegger’s chief of staff, 6 state Senators, 10 state representatives (the congresspeople most centrally relevant to the actual framing of the policy), as well as people like the CEO of Southern California Edison and the US Ambassador to Chile. The governor’s law, AB 32, says what the targets are. It doesn’t say the best way to meet them. They’ve been on a trip to South America for 2 weeks, for the purpose of figuring out the actual strategy. Meeting with us was part of that goal.

The meeting took place at a vineyard about an hour outside of Santiago. It was beautiful, almost beyond description. A paradise. I’ve never been to a vineyard before, and I fell in love instantly. Probably, one of the most romantic places I’ve ever been, in both senses of the word. We took a tour of the vineyard and all the wine-making facilities, including a naturally climate controlled room underground, with low lighting, soil on the ground (for moisture control), brick arches, and the best wine in the vineyard in French Oak barrels all around us. Each barrel contained about 20,000 dollars worth of Viña Underraga reserve. It was a pretty special place, and I won’t soon forget it.

At the vineyard, I met Mack and Bev Tadeu. Mack is the business ambassador to Chile. He facilitates joint ventures between US and Chilean companies, and also does what he can to strengthen trade ties. His formal title is “Commercial Counselor” to Chile. Anyway, he figured I’d be homesick for Thanksgiving, so he graciously invited me over to his home for a beautiful Thanksgiving dinner yesterday. It was superb. It’s also nice that the sun doesn’t go down until 9 PM, because we ate at 5:30, finished at 7, and then went outside in the late-afternoon sun, drank port, and talked in the 70 degree weather for another 2 hours. They had about 15 guests for dinner, and it was extremely well done.

There’s your update! It’s 10 PM, Friday night. I’m debating going out on the town, just winging it by myself. In fact, I’m thinking that that’s exactly what I’m going to do.

Take care, you all.

Thursday, November 16, 2006

If you've got an hour to spend, these articles are the best introduction to global warming I've ever read. It was a three part series in the New Yorker by Elizabeth Kolbert. After reading these closely, you will be better educated on this issue than 95% of the American public. That's kind of scary. Please read these, even if you think you already know everything you need to. They are extremely well written.

http://www.newyorker.com/printables/fact/050425fa_fact3

http://www.newyorker.com/printables/fact/050502fa_fact3

http://www.newyorker.com/printables/fact/050509fa_fact3

First Impressions of Chile

I'm writing from the 16th floor of an office building in Las Condes, a district of Santiago. It's in the Northeast of the city. Everything so far has been great, and the main possible pitfalls have been safely avoided-- my host mother and her children are very nice and helpful, and I like the people in the office. If either of those had not turned out to be true, it could have been a disaster. The Chileans speak a fast, clipped Spanish that is hard to get used to. They conflate any syllables that they can, and almost never pronounce the letter 's'. I live in "LaConde", for instance. It makes it hard to tell the difference between plurals and singulars, but I'm getting used to it. They have other ways of implying plurality that are hard to describe, but you just kinda get it. My spanish is better than I thought, especially listening comprehension. I brought some Spanish textbooks with me, and am going to be working on them at nights when I have the energy. I have always felt that speaking a foreign language encompassed two distinct skills, because understanding others and expressing yourself are very different talents. For the former, until you're absolutely fluent the key is to understand their speech as a whole, without getting sidetracked if you don't understand the occasional word or phrase. For the latter, you just have to build up your vocabulary. I find that using books is easier than trying to remember every time someone teaches me a new word. When I look it up in the dictionary, it sticks.

Santiago is a very smoggy city, and apparently it is much worse in the winter. I don't think that there is more pollution here than other places, but due to the combinations of the mountains, elevation, and wind patterns, it hangs in the air. It is still beautiful, and the mountains are truly impressive. I haven't explored Santiago at all yet, and probably won't have time to do so much during the week. The office is literally across the street from my home. Most people spend more than 30 minutes commuting, so this is a true convenience. The working hours are going to be roughly 9-7, but it will depend on the workload. I arrived Monday afternoon, spent the day unpacking and getting to know my host family, and went to bed early. I walk across the street to work, home for lunch, and then will come home at 7 or 8.

My host mother works in a private school. She is very nice, is extremely catholic, and was recently divorced. This is quite a novelty in this country, and has only been legal for 2 years, so that should demonstrate that she's a pretty independent and interesting woman. At the school, I think she does a combination of teaching and secretarial work, but it isn't clear. She has three children, a 21 year old daughter, a 20 year old son, and a 12 year old daughter. Her eldest daughter, Maria, is in her first year at the Catholic University, she's studying international politics and is interested in Asia specifically. She's very knowledgeable about it from our conversations, and she wants to spend some time in Japan. The son, Nicolas, is doing construction engineering. I think he is in the process of getting a technical degree, which people normally do before going on to other schooling. Right now, he's working full time on a construction project. They are either building or rebuilding a huge underground tunnel for cars and the subway. He works as a supervisor of sorts, and on site he works on safety and environmental aspects of the project. The 12 year old is in a K-12 private school, and is very nice. She's a little chubby, and so we don't have any sweets in the house which is fine with me.

The family lives in a 10-story apartment building across the street from my work. The apartment is big. It is on the corner of the building, and is surrounded by windows and glass doors that are always open.It has 5 bedrooms, including the mother's room. It is common here to have "paying guests" that rent a room in your home, and at least 2 of the bedrooms were designed to be such. I am living in one of them. It is small but comfortable, with a bed, desk, and closet. From my room, I can access the porch that encircles the apartment building. Everything is green, green, green, lots of chirping birds and honking horns. The apartment has lots of art in it, mostly paintings by the mother and her sisters. They are not poor, as their kids are in private school and university, but they live a very simple life which is actually quite soothing to come home to. They have one, small TV and a computer, both in the same small TV room. On the TV, they have cable. Most of their channels, to my initial shock, are simply in English with subtitles. We get most major american channels and programs here, the same day they air at home. However, there are some that are dubbed in Spanish and some with subtitles. The dubbed shows are reruns. The subtitles are usually very simple, and don't do a very good job of conveying the dialogue, because the Spanish audience has to be able to read as fast as the words are spoken on TV. So, as a result, the dialogue is dumbed down, even more so than the original sit-coms are. The dubbed shows can be quite funny. As I ate breakfast this morning, I watched Power Rangers in Spanish and laughed a lot.

My host mother is used to hosting people like me. Each night, she cooks food for the following day. As is the custom, we all return home for lunch, but at different times. So, in the fridge each morning is a plate for each of us which we are to microwave whenever we're home. At night, we all sit around the table and eat dinner together, and it's a bigger portion of the same meal we had for lunch. So, it's like eating left overs ahead of time. She is a perfectly acceptable cook, if no frills, and this arrangement does a good job of accommodating everybody. On the weekends, when everyone's home, cooking is more like normal, where she will cook in the late afternoon and we'll all eat together when it's ready. She's very nice and maternal. She came in and kissed my forehead last night when I got in bed, and she's excited that I'm here.

I hope to explore Santiago on the weekends, but during the week I basically go to work, come home, eat dinner, spend an hour or two with the family talking, and then go to bed. I hope to travel some while here, but definitely not going to start making plans until next Monday is over. Monday, we receive a delegation from California, and we're trying to convince them that their climate policy should include the kind of trading that we do, where developed countries reach their emissions targets through a combination of regulations in their own countries and sponsoring projects in the developing world.

That's the update for now. The women are beautiful here, almost glamorous. Nicolas has promised to take me out with him this weekend, which I'm looking forward to.

Only other news is that I've decided to leave my computer at work during the week so that I spend more time talking and practicing Spanish while I'm at home. From now on, I will probably write most of my emails to people back home on the weekends. I plan to take photos soon and post them here.

That's basically the whole update. I'm developing a deeper appreciation for the Spanish language... its intricacies and delightful surprises.

For instance:
1) A daycare center is called "un jardín de niños"
2) In Spanish, estar means "to be" in the temporary sense, such as "I am at the mall." Ser means "to be" in the permanent sense, like "I am a doctor." So, in the grammar-subconscious of this language, there are cool relationships between these words.
Example: "Listo"
Estoy listo: I'm ready (as in, I'm ready to go to dinner)
Soy listo: I'm clever
So, another way of looking at it is that, subconsciously, in this language to be clever is to be permanently, perpetually ready. Clever people are always ready for anything. I love that.
To be perpetually bored is to be boring. Also true.
3) "To taste" and "to know" have the same root

Chao

Saturday, October 07, 2006

Rachmaninoff

One other thing--

The other day, Tim and I were listening to Rachmaninoff's 3rd on my Bose Waveradio. Tim was ironing, but we don't have an ironing board, so he's got a towel draped over his drawers and is ironing on top of that. For those of you that don't know, Tim is a very serious classical musician and conductor... his senior year, he performed 3 Sonatas with the best concert pianist in Africa, and has just been made principal flutist of the LSE Orchestra after "a rubbish audition," in his own words. Anyway, we're listening to this breathtaking section where the mood shifts utterly and suddenly, and I make the comment that it is "virtuosic composing." Tim really likes this, and as the music swells again he is overwhelmed and whirls around, "CAN YOU IMAGINE CONDUCTING THIS!" he bellows, and he sweeps around the room, waving his arms like a madman, navigating the concerto safely through its emotional apex...
...until he whirls around again, and seeks smoke whirling from the iron, which he has left face-down on the towel in his fit of conducting,

"AH!" he shrieks
"HA!" I laugh

The towel, now, has a permanent brown burnspot, marking the point in time where Tim's musical passion overwhelmed his respect for fire safety.

Friday, October 06, 2006

Beginnings


(reading London for Dummies)

Hello!

May this be the first post of many. I apologize for the delay-- I have finally settled in and taken some photos, and offer this humblest of beginnings to what I hope will grow into the journal of one of the most important years of my life.

Things are great here. Settling in was quite a task. I feel like I've been here for ages... it's certainly been a month longer than most. But now, somehow, the subtle transformation has occurred, and Bankside House, Room 533 feels like home. A Columbia undergrad lives a truly nomadic life, and we learn without knowing it how to pull this off... but, nevertheless, the pieces are in place for this to be a truly great year. Here I find myself again, getting acquainted with another immense and exciting city. It's a comfortingly insurmountable task, and one that I will thoroughly enjoy tackling.

I decided to spend my junior year at the London School of Economics for a variety of reasons. The idea of trading a year, or even a semester, of my time at Columbia for "the study abroad experience" (read: being academically idle somewhere beautiful) did not sit well with me or with my undergraduate goals. This became more true as I got interested in the confluences of Economics and Environmental Science, because Columbia is truly a haven for both subjects and their various interactions. When I decided to do the double major, I knew that I didn't have a year or semester to dawdle in Fiji. So, for me, this was a chance to keep my stride intellectually while diving head-first into a new big city, all over again-- for me, I doubt there's anything more exciting than planting myself down all over again, starting from scratch, and seeing what sort of a context I create for myself in the coming 10 months. I came to LSE to explore econ and environmental science from a European angle-- while Columbia is truly among the world's best universities to study things like sustainable development, global warming, and renewable energy, LSE benefits from the fact that it is situated in a city, country, and continent where these concepts are more mainstream and accepted in culture. In this regard, moving to London is like getting in a time machine-- it's not a question of if the USA will start to care about the global environmental degradation it causes, but rather one of when (the "when" will come about when people realize that they either have to trust people like me or assume that they know more about it than I do.) When we do, I imagine that New York will be to America much as London is to Europe: the financial nerve center of a vast, global economic engine, where efforts to make rational and scientific our interaction with the global environment are dreamt up, planned, and executed. It's really exciting in that regard. I also came to LSE because I saw it as a great chance to develop further my knowledge of these concepts by being exposed to alternative schools of thought. Columbia is fully entranced by "The Sachs School" of Sustainable Development, and LSE's Development Studies Institute presents very interesting challenges to Sachs and his conclusions, while still trying to achieve the same goals. hus




At the airport



There are other reasons I came abroad. I don't know if I'm going to stay in New York after graduation, so the idea of leaving for a year and then coming back appealed to me-- this way, I can come back with fresh eyes and with a list of the things that I really missed about the city, and I can enjoy those things thoroughly before leaving. I was attracted to the idea of starting over, all over again, and this time knowing more about starting over. It's just very liberating, the ability to pick up everything and move to another continent for a year, and I know that am less likely to be able to pull that off later in life. I decided there was very little I could do in 3 years at Columbia that I couldn't do in 4, and that the amount of life experience and growth I would achieve by subjecting myself to this shake-up would be far in excess of that which I would have had if I had spent junior year at home. LSE's schedule is very different-- you take 4 courses, which last all year, rather than an American semester-type system, so I'll get to explore some of these topics in depth. LSE additionally gives us a month off for Christmas, and a month off for Easter. This affords me the chance to travel in a way that I've never really done before. I'm currently planning to spend at least one of those months in East Africa with my best friend and roommate, Tim-- we've been dreaming of Cape Town to Cairo for months now. It looks like that's going to be in April, so currently I'm not sure what I'm going to do for Christmas. I've been invited to spend New Years in Greece, and I will probably end up spending a week there which will be delightful. Not sure what to do from December 8th to New Years, however. Might do a sustained stay in Spain, or might work my way from Russia to Greece, or maybe something else. The possibility of doing two sustained trips like that was another part of the reason I came.

So, academics:
I've decided on my class schedule. I'll be taking 3 courses that last all year, and my 4th will be split between a first-term course and a second-term course. In addition to that, I've gotten permission from DESTIN (LSE's DEvelopment STudies INstitute) to sit in on a few other master's level development courses. For those courses, I'll never do the homework and will only do the core reading, so that I can gain exposure to the topics (which I can't really study at CU).

Courses I'm taking:


Full Year:

Development Economics, http://www.lse.ac.uk/resources/calendar/courseGuides/EC/2006_EC307.htm

International Economics,
http://www.lse.ac.uk/resources/calendar/courseGuides/EC/2006_EC315.htm

Industrial Economics,
http://www.lse.ac.uk/resources/calendar/courseGuides/EC/2006_EC313.htm



First Semester:
Concepts in Environmental Regulation (Masters),
http://www.lse.ac.uk/resources/calendar/courseGuides/GY/2006_GY465.htm

Second Semester:
The Anthropology of Southern Africa,
http://www.lse.ac.uk/resources/calendar/courseGuides/AN/2006_AN235.htm


Courses I am sitting in on (auditing):

Institutions and Development (Both Semesters)

http://www.lse.ac.uk/resources/calendar/courseGuides/DV/2006_DV413.htm
http://www.lse.ac.uk/resources/calendar/courseGuides/DV/2006_DV415.htm

and Economic Development Policy (Also full year)
http://www.lse.ac.uk/resources/calendar/courseGuides/DV/2006_DV409.htm


That's my academic plans.

Trip plans: December 8- January 8, and March 16-April 20th or so.

I'd say that that's sufficient for background information. Allow me to take you on a photo tour:

1) My enormous, beautiful room
2) Photos of the walk to campus
3) LSE area

----------------------

Bankside House (My dorm):

See those rooms in the corners, with the big bay windows? Wouldn't it be nice to have the highest room with that kind of set up? Why, yes, yes it is


The door to room 533...


Looking into our room. Huge map of London on the right, and there's Tim at the back of the room.


My desk


Tim's desk, with the map of the world behind it


Beds and Dressers-- Map of Europe on my wall



You can't tell from any one photo, but our room is enormous. It's by far the biggest room in the building. People walk in and gasp.


The windows, which face Northwest



The view out the window-- that's the Tate Modern, and the buildings in the distance are across the Thames

-----------------------------------------------
The walk from Bankside House to LSE campus. These photos were taken in the course of the ordinary walk, ie, there were no detours to take them... this is what I actually see every morning.



Step out of the building, looking north...


Head Northwest, towards the river, past these lawns and the Tate Modern




Bankside is only 1 building away from the water, so I hit the Thames within 2 minutes. This is Southwark bridge, which I walk under.



Looking back on the Tate Modern from the same spot.


Between Southwark and Blackfriars Bridge. I really like these columns. Blackfriar's on left, which I cross each morning.



Only eccentric instruments under these bridges-- xylophone and uhadi are featured highly, for some reason. One Reggae artist comes once a week.


Up onto Blackfriar's Bridge, and across.



Looking left, off the bridge, onto the Thames (walking across the bridge is beautiful, takes about 3-4 minutes


Looking right. Skyline includes the Gherkin and St. Pauls



Reach the other side and turn left, and stay on this sidewalk for about 6 minutes, always along the water...


View back at Tate and Bankside from other side of river.


Pass this beautiful garden, called the "Inner Temple" ??



And some really nice greenery and buildings.


Keep along the river until I hit Temple Station, where I hang a right...


...and head up this street to LSE. The building at the end of this street, dead ahead, is part of LSE campus.


The LSE area generally looks like this. Curvy streets, double decker buses, and nice wide sidewalks and trees. Expensive shops, important people.



Lots of statues as well.



And, as a final, sad note, I took this picture only 2 hours later as I was walking back to Bankside:

Weather changes for the worse very quickly here, but doesn't change for the better nearly as fast. At least, it feels that way.

-------------------------

Images of LSE:
First two things I saw, right when I got to campus? A penguin and Columbia House. They heard I was coming!!


This sits outside the bookshop. I had heard of this statue before I knew LSE's mascot, and excitedly hoped to be a penguin for a year! A google-search and 0.012 seconds later, I was disappointed to find out that I had joined the ranks of the LSE..... Beavers.
The bar in the basement of my dorm (didn't I mention that?) is called the Belching Beaver. Classssssssssssssy



Told you.


LSE's "College Walk"-- Very small campus, because all the dorms are 10-35 minutes away

























Old Building. Some of these buildings have beatiful facades, some are hideous.





















Other main walkway on Campus-- every building in view is a class-building. LSE is centralized like Columbia, but unstandardized like NYU. It's refreshing.


----------------------
Views of my neighborhood:

The Globe Theatre, where I saw Antony and Cleopatra. Beautiful weather, fantastic cast. Much more dramatic and compelling than expected, and only 5 pounds for a student ticket. Students here are pitied, and they give us lots of discounts.



The Tate and Millenium Bridge, after a long evening at a bar called "Vodka Island." Good decisions made by everyone. This was, by the way, on Monday.

Defying all detractors, as well as most laws of physics, immediately after this picture was taken, I danced a continuous jig across the Millenium Bridge. Non-stop jig-athon, probably 5 minutes long, all the way across the Thames. There's a good chance I'm the first person who has ever danced a jig all the way across the Thames, despite the presence of bridges for over 1000 years here. If not, I am CERTAINLY the first person who has ever jigged nonstop across the Millenium Bridge. Tell your friends.






Southbank at Dusk-- That's the London Eye




Same beautiful scene, this picture is from Blackfriar's Bridge.

By the way-- when I go running in London, I run along the Thames. Cross one of these bridges and run back along the other side-- in other words, this is my backyard, and this is what I see when I go running. It's really nice.
























The Royal Houses of Justice. Also, I must say, a well-taken photograph.


Posting the photo-tour on here took me 3 hours just now, because of this websites inane design. I won't be doing this again, but will hopefully post other pictures later in an easier form. In any case, this should give you a much better idea of my current reality. Thanks for stopping by.

I'll leave you with some closing thoughts....
--------------------
Other notes, or: "Things that I thought you might find amusing"

1) Stoners from Liverpool. One of those great things you just had no idea existed... Really, after hearing a Liverpool accent it should be simply illegal for anyone else, other than Jamaicans, to smoke pot. These guys were born to smoke pot. They sound just like the Beatles, just like the Vultures from the Jungle Book, all the time, with that kind of lyrical, but not sing-song, rise at the end of every phrase: "These chips are really ^good^, mate." They were born to have their hair in their eyes, idle but not bored-- maddeningly clever people, they are. They're a delight.

2) Separate water faucets. Katy Steinmetz, a fellow Springfieldian-turned-Columbian-turned-Brit, has already humorously captured this, but it's true: this is the worst. My bathroom has 2 faucets on the sink. What's that? You want luke-warm water, you say? Nope. You get to choose between molten lava on the left and arctic snowmelt on the right. Really good for, say, washing one's face, or shaving. F-

3) No "door close" button on the elevator. This is annoying, but humorous: in the US, you take for granted the fact that you can press a button that hastily shuts the doors of the elevator. On one hand, I kind of like the fact that there's no option that allows such rude behavior, but on the other hand, I've already wasted at least 10 minutes, cumulatively, waiting for the elevator doors to close after pressing my floor.

4) Drunks here > drunks in NY. At any pub in London, you're guaranteed to find a few guys who you know have been there all day and have no plans to leave. Usually, they have UNBELIEVABLE hats on, big red faces, some sort of limp, and hilariously indecipherable accents. The best? When they're all sitting around the same table.

5) Immigrants with British accents-- yet another thing I didn't really expect, but that makes perfect sense now that I'm here. Especially all these Indian kids who grew up all over the UK. I was invited to a house party last weekend, which I attended. The hostess was a 5'2, 120 pound Indian girl in stilettos.... with an A+ hard-ass, unbelievable Scottish accent. Quite a shock, but really pleasant actually.

6) Peoplewatching on campus-- LSE is a great place to peoplewatch, because you have a great mix of students. There are the nice and categorically witty/cynical Londoners from middle class families, as well as Londoners from more upper-crust beginnings, but that's just the start. Students from every country in Europe are here, as well as many Asian and African countries. A non-negligable amount of the students from developing countries, just like any top-tier school, come from the extremely wealthy creme-de-la-creme stock at home. I'm sure some of them come from immeasurably wealthy families, drug lords, etc... it's like the Mafia "My dad is in the sanitation business" stuff, but exponentially more humorous. I've heard more than one kid from a non-European country say something along the lines of "My dad's a.... an industrialist"

A nice complement to this has been the peoplewatching in those graduate classes that I am auditing, because it is a veritable HAVEN for UECs-- untouchable european countesses-- the mid-twenties fabulous old-stock European contingent, "The Algerians that work in my vineyard are more cultured than you, George Olive," that are studying things like "Post-continental philosophical anthropology of gender roles in 1871..." It's like the extreme form of what any 20 year old guy encounters with the Jewish girls on the upper east side... you aren't even looking at them, and they shoot you a look like "you must be kidding." Fabulous!


I've walked home in the rain a few times, but perhaps the most humorous image of me I can leave you with is a few days ago, walking home in the rain in shorts and my Jesus (Big Lebowski) t-shirt, walking across the Blackfriar's bridge, eating a Banana and listening to Johnny Cash.

Thanks for reading
-George